Print
E-mail
Comment
Obama: Congress must act boldly and now on economy
 |
| President-elect Barack Obama finishes speaking about the economy Thursday at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va. |
By David Espo and Jennifer Loven
WASHINGTON – President-elect Barack Obama implored Congress on Thursday to “act boldly and act now” to fix an economy growing perilously weaker. Leading lawmakers set an informal goal of mid-February for enacting tax cuts and government spending that could cost as much as $1 trillion.
Democrats complained openly about the incoming administration’s proposed tax cuts and Republicans warned against excessive new spending, both parties letting Obama know they intend to place their own stamp on the economic recovery effort.
A call for a $3,000 tax break for job creation drew particular criticism in a private meeting, and numerous lawmakers said Obama had not ticketed enough of his tax proposal for energy projects.
But there was little or no dispute about the need for action, and Obama’s remarks coincided with a pair of government reports showing fresh weakness in an economy already in crisis. An updated reading on unemployment was expected to bring even more bad news on Friday.
“If nothing is done, this recession could linger for years,” with unemployment reaching double digits, Obama said in a speech at George Mason University in suburban Virginia. “A bad situation could become dramatically worse.”
Less than two weeks from taking office as the 44th president, Obama has become increasingly vocal in recent days about the need for steps to revitalize the economy, even though he has continued to defer to President George W. Bush on matters of foreign policy.
Obama’s aides and congressional Democrats have worked for weeks on legislation to create jobs, help the unemployed, cut taxes and aid cash-strapped states. Obama sent his chief political strategist, David Axelrod, and incoming chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, as well as other aides to the Capitol for a series of meetings with lawmakers.
The measure probably will include a bewildering array of provisions – from subsidies to help the newly unemployed afford their health care to a massive new effort to improve the energy efficiency of federal buildings.
Obama said this week he hoped to be able to sign legislation by early to mid-February. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., promised lawmakers she would cancel next month’s planned Presidents’ Day vacation if necessary.
“We are not going home without an economic recovery package,” she said at a news conference. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, at a difference appearance, agreed that allowed enough time to get the job done.
“But we ... don’t want to make big mistakes that exacerbate the – the problem we already have, which is a dramatic, eye-popping deficit,” he added.
Lawmakers in both parties were digging into the details – few of which have been made public – and not always liking what they saw.
Democrats emerging from a private meeting of the Senate Finance Committee had little positive to say about Obama’s tax cut proposals. Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., was critical of a proposed tax break for workers and their families.
“Twenty bucks a week. How much of a lift is that going to give?” he said. Nor did he sound positive about a proposed tax break for businesses to create jobs. “If I’m a business person, it’s unlikely if you give me a several thousand dollar credit that I’m going to hire people if I can’t sell the products they’re producing,” he said.
Conrad and others said Obama’s blueprint included about $10 billion in tax incentives related to energy, out of about $300 billion overall – a slice they said was too small.
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., added, “Just giving people $500 or $600, while certainly welcome when there is all this economic hurt, may not be the best stimulus.” He cited evidence that taxpayers used money from the last economic stimulus measure to pay down their debt, rather than make new purchases.
Republicans noted forecasts of a record $1.2 trillion deficit for the current year and said too much additional spending could be harmful. “We can’t buy prosperity with more and more government spending,” said Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader.
In his speech, Obama said more bad news was just ahead. He predicted that on Friday, “We are likely to learn that we lost more jobs last year than at any time since World War II.”
There were two government reports released within hours of his speech, both showing more weakness in the economy.
One said consumer borrowing – credit card use and items such as new auto loans – plunged by $7.94 billion in November, a record amount in dollar terms.
A second said more men and women were drawing jobless benefits last week than at any time since the 1982 recession. Joblessness was 6.7 percent in the government’s most recent report before Friday’s new figures.
In his speech, Obama said there was plenty of blame to go around for the current economic situation. He cited “an era of profound irresponsibility that stretched from corporate boardrooms to the halls of power in Washington, D.C.”
Yet he also projected an air of confidence about the future.
Democrats complained openly about the incoming administration’s proposed tax cuts and Republicans warned against excessive new spending, both parties letting Obama know they intend to place their own stamp on the economic recovery effort.
A call for a $3,000 tax break for job creation drew particular criticism in a private meeting, and numerous lawmakers said Obama had not ticketed enough of his tax proposal for energy projects.
But there was little or no dispute about the need for action, and Obama’s remarks coincided with a pair of government reports showing fresh weakness in an economy already in crisis. An updated reading on unemployment was expected to bring even more bad news on Friday.
“If nothing is done, this recession could linger for years,” with unemployment reaching double digits, Obama said in a speech at George Mason University in suburban Virginia. “A bad situation could become dramatically worse.”
Less than two weeks from taking office as the 44th president, Obama has become increasingly vocal in recent days about the need for steps to revitalize the economy, even though he has continued to defer to President George W. Bush on matters of foreign policy.
Obama’s aides and congressional Democrats have worked for weeks on legislation to create jobs, help the unemployed, cut taxes and aid cash-strapped states. Obama sent his chief political strategist, David Axelrod, and incoming chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, as well as other aides to the Capitol for a series of meetings with lawmakers.
The measure probably will include a bewildering array of provisions – from subsidies to help the newly unemployed afford their health care to a massive new effort to improve the energy efficiency of federal buildings.
Obama said this week he hoped to be able to sign legislation by early to mid-February. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., promised lawmakers she would cancel next month’s planned Presidents’ Day vacation if necessary.
“We are not going home without an economic recovery package,” she said at a news conference. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, at a difference appearance, agreed that allowed enough time to get the job done.
“But we ... don’t want to make big mistakes that exacerbate the – the problem we already have, which is a dramatic, eye-popping deficit,” he added.
Lawmakers in both parties were digging into the details – few of which have been made public – and not always liking what they saw.
Democrats emerging from a private meeting of the Senate Finance Committee had little positive to say about Obama’s tax cut proposals. Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., was critical of a proposed tax break for workers and their families.
“Twenty bucks a week. How much of a lift is that going to give?” he said. Nor did he sound positive about a proposed tax break for businesses to create jobs. “If I’m a business person, it’s unlikely if you give me a several thousand dollar credit that I’m going to hire people if I can’t sell the products they’re producing,” he said.
Conrad and others said Obama’s blueprint included about $10 billion in tax incentives related to energy, out of about $300 billion overall – a slice they said was too small.
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., added, “Just giving people $500 or $600, while certainly welcome when there is all this economic hurt, may not be the best stimulus.” He cited evidence that taxpayers used money from the last economic stimulus measure to pay down their debt, rather than make new purchases.
Republicans noted forecasts of a record $1.2 trillion deficit for the current year and said too much additional spending could be harmful. “We can’t buy prosperity with more and more government spending,” said Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader.
In his speech, Obama said more bad news was just ahead. He predicted that on Friday, “We are likely to learn that we lost more jobs last year than at any time since World War II.”
There were two government reports released within hours of his speech, both showing more weakness in the economy.
One said consumer borrowing – credit card use and items such as new auto loans – plunged by $7.94 billion in November, a record amount in dollar terms.
A second said more men and women were drawing jobless benefits last week than at any time since the 1982 recession. Joblessness was 6.7 percent in the government’s most recent report before Friday’s new figures.
In his speech, Obama said there was plenty of blame to go around for the current economic situation. He cited “an era of profound irresponsibility that stretched from corporate boardrooms to the halls of power in Washington, D.C.”
Yet he also projected an air of confidence about the future.
Submit a Comment
|
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
Not yet a registered member?
Click here to become one. Comments to stories and articles on the Web site are not edited or pre-approved before appearing online. Readers posting comments are solely responsible for those comments. Comments must be germane to the story to which they apply. Online comments that are libelous, profane or personally attack another site participant can be reported as abuse using the link provided on each comment. Comments reported as abusive will be reviewed and may be removed from view, as will off-topic comments. BE CIVIL. Individuals continually posting abusive comments to the site may have their registrations revoked. |
Reader Comments
seacat162 wrote on Jan 9, 2009 10:14 AM:
" Hey I hope Mr. Obama can do all he says he can. If any one can recall back when The other Bush was in office he left this country almost as in bad of shape that it is in now, and then Clinton had to get it back on track. Now the young Bush came in and left it in worse shape than his father. Go figure. If something can't be done we will have alot of crime. Most city people do not know how to make it with out money. Obama is going to need all the help he can get. Wake up people this country is in bad shape and something has to be done. People not having a job. People losing there home, car, etc Companys going out of business. Now gas prices going back up. I just hope something can be done before it gets worse. "
BigTexN wrote on Jan 9, 2009 11:07 AM:
" This article from usnews.com shows a town of 194 people asking for $375 million in stimulous!
That's almost $2 million per resident!
Let's not leave out the $5 billion bailout for the sex film industry.
seacat, I think things have already gotten worse...
http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/stimulus/2009/01/08/why-a-tiny-alabama-town-wants-a-375-million-chunk-of-the-stimulus.html
Also seacat, in your Bush-bashing, I noticed how you left out:
- the tech bubble burst that occurred under the Clinton administration, driving the NASDAQ from 5,000 points to 1100 points.
- that you neglected to mention that, during the Bush administration, the Dow Jones did set an all time high of 14,100 in it's recovery from the Clinton technology bubble burst of 1999
- and let's not leave out what wonders Clinton did for the cigar industry while diddling his assistant in the oval office.
Economies run in cycles but you can feed this "Clinton had to get it back on track" garbage to some other sycophant. "
That's almost $2 million per resident!
Let's not leave out the $5 billion bailout for the sex film industry.
seacat, I think things have already gotten worse...
http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/stimulus/2009/01/08/why-a-tiny-alabama-town-wants-a-375-million-chunk-of-the-stimulus.html
Also seacat, in your Bush-bashing, I noticed how you left out:
- the tech bubble burst that occurred under the Clinton administration, driving the NASDAQ from 5,000 points to 1100 points.
- that you neglected to mention that, during the Bush administration, the Dow Jones did set an all time high of 14,100 in it's recovery from the Clinton technology bubble burst of 1999
- and let's not leave out what wonders Clinton did for the cigar industry while diddling his assistant in the oval office.
Economies run in cycles but you can feed this "Clinton had to get it back on track" garbage to some other sycophant. "
seacat162 wrote on Jan 9, 2009 11:22 AM:
" Every president has it's bad and good I just Obama is one of the good guys. Only time will tell. "
nicoleshelby wrote on Jan 9, 2009 1:58 PM:
" Our deficit is over 1,000,000,000,000. I read in the Chronicle yesterday that our congress wasn't aware of our deficit. Someone explain to me.....if congress wasn't aware that our deficit was this high....how the h*ll are they going to boldly go where they apparently have never gone before? I'm thinking another "head out of denial" is appropriate here. Also, someone tell me what congress does again? I'm thinking nothing, but vote themselves raises. I thought fiscal spending was their responsibility? "
BigTexN wrote on Jan 9, 2009 9:20 AM:
That way I don't have to worry about the stimulous check bouncing...my bank charges me when a deposit gets returned for insufficient funds...
Thanks! "