Print
E-mail
Comment
NASA report uncovers flaws in Columbia shuttle safety
  
|
By Dana Guthrie
There was no way the Columbia crew could have survived the shuttle’s 2003 crash, but NASA officials have identified several safety issues that could have been avoided.
A report, released Tuesday by the shuttle program’s Spacecraft Crew Survival Integrated Investigation Team, describes in detail the event that likely killed the crew and analyzes four more events that would have also been fatal had the crew survived longer.
The space shuttle is set to retire in 2010, and JSC engineers and contractors are in the midst of designing its replacement, the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle and the Ares rocket that will transport astronauts to the moon.
“The results of this investigation are intended to add meaning to the sacrifice of the crew’s lives by making space flight safer for all future generations,” the investigation team said in the report.
Investigators found that the Columbia crew did not have time to protect themselves after cabin pressure decreased, mostly because they were too busy with re-entry procedures to finish putting on protective gear before the accident.
The suits worn by the Columbia crew were not designed at the same time as the shuttle – the suit design was altered twice after the Challenger 7 disaster. Also, the crew must complete a number of cabin stowage tasks prior to re-entry, the report states.
Because helmet visors and gloves can impede those tasks, one crew member was not wearing a helmet and three were not wearing gloves when Columbia lost control. According to trained procedure, those with helmets on had their visors up.
“There was a period of about 40 seconds after the orbiter lost control but prior to depressurization, when the crew was conscious and capable of action,” the report states.
“Part of this short timeframe was undoubtedly employed in recognizing that a problem existed, as the indications of the loss of control developed gradually.”
The investigation found that if crew members had been trained more on the transition between vehicle operations and survival measures, they may have lowered their visors while it was still possible.
Once cabin pressure dropped, even crew members with their helmets on passed out before they could lower their visors and likely did not regain consciousness, investigators said.
When Columbia split into pieces and the crew cabin began to roll, the crew’s upper harnesses did not lock, because they were not designed to do so in those conditions, the report states.
“Helmets that did not conform to the head and the lack of upper body restraint resulted in injuries and lethal trauma” to the unconscious or deceased crew members, investigators said.
Crew module breakup
The third event, and the least-understood, was the crew’s ejection from the seats and cabin. The only way to protect crews from cabin disintegration is to prevent it from happening, the report states. The team also found that seat restraints would have caused traumatic injury had the crew not been killed by previous events.
The fourth lethal event was exposure to the atmosphere during the fall from the destroyed shuttle in near-vacuum, extremely cold conditions. Fatal ground impact was the fifth event.
The team recommends strengthening weak areas of the suit system to protect astronauts from atmospheric conditions.
In addition, the parachutes designed to protect the crew from ground impact require astronauts to activate them manually
Because there has been limited study of spacecraft accidents, the team was forced to make its recommendations with some level of speculation.
The investigation team’s recommendations call for better safety technology that takes more potential emergencies into account and is built into future spacecraft from the start of the design phase.
The team also urges NASA officials to place high priority on crew survival investigations for all future spacecraft mishaps.
A report, released Tuesday by the shuttle program’s Spacecraft Crew Survival Integrated Investigation Team, describes in detail the event that likely killed the crew and analyzes four more events that would have also been fatal had the crew survived longer.
The space shuttle is set to retire in 2010, and JSC engineers and contractors are in the midst of designing its replacement, the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle and the Ares rocket that will transport astronauts to the moon.
“The results of this investigation are intended to add meaning to the sacrifice of the crew’s lives by making space flight safer for all future generations,” the investigation team said in the report.
Investigators found that the Columbia crew did not have time to protect themselves after cabin pressure decreased, mostly because they were too busy with re-entry procedures to finish putting on protective gear before the accident.
The suits worn by the Columbia crew were not designed at the same time as the shuttle – the suit design was altered twice after the Challenger 7 disaster. Also, the crew must complete a number of cabin stowage tasks prior to re-entry, the report states.
Because helmet visors and gloves can impede those tasks, one crew member was not wearing a helmet and three were not wearing gloves when Columbia lost control. According to trained procedure, those with helmets on had their visors up.
“There was a period of about 40 seconds after the orbiter lost control but prior to depressurization, when the crew was conscious and capable of action,” the report states.
“Part of this short timeframe was undoubtedly employed in recognizing that a problem existed, as the indications of the loss of control developed gradually.”
The investigation found that if crew members had been trained more on the transition between vehicle operations and survival measures, they may have lowered their visors while it was still possible.
Once cabin pressure dropped, even crew members with their helmets on passed out before they could lower their visors and likely did not regain consciousness, investigators said.
When Columbia split into pieces and the crew cabin began to roll, the crew’s upper harnesses did not lock, because they were not designed to do so in those conditions, the report states.
“Helmets that did not conform to the head and the lack of upper body restraint resulted in injuries and lethal trauma” to the unconscious or deceased crew members, investigators said.
Crew module breakup
The third event, and the least-understood, was the crew’s ejection from the seats and cabin. The only way to protect crews from cabin disintegration is to prevent it from happening, the report states. The team also found that seat restraints would have caused traumatic injury had the crew not been killed by previous events.
The fourth lethal event was exposure to the atmosphere during the fall from the destroyed shuttle in near-vacuum, extremely cold conditions. Fatal ground impact was the fifth event.
The team recommends strengthening weak areas of the suit system to protect astronauts from atmospheric conditions.
In addition, the parachutes designed to protect the crew from ground impact require astronauts to activate them manually
Because there has been limited study of spacecraft accidents, the team was forced to make its recommendations with some level of speculation.
The investigation team’s recommendations call for better safety technology that takes more potential emergencies into account and is built into future spacecraft from the start of the design phase.
The team also urges NASA officials to place high priority on crew survival investigations for all future spacecraft mishaps.
Submit a Comment
|
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
Not yet a registered member?
Click here to become one. Comments to stories and articles on the Web site are not edited or pre-approved before appearing online. Readers posting comments are solely responsible for those comments. Comments must be germane to the story to which they apply. Online comments that are libelous, profane or personally attack another site participant can be reported as abuse using the link provided on each comment. Comments reported as abusive will be reviewed and may be removed from view, as will off-topic comments. BE CIVIL. Individuals continually posting abusive comments to the site may have their registrations revoked. |
Reader Comments
kyhooya wrote on Dec 31, 2008 7:39 AM:
" Can't go with you there echo. Space is very important. But we all have opinions and they are all like sphincters...they all stink.
No way to save those astronauts. Just like a dragster heading down a track once it goes you are at the mercy of the elements. G_d desides whether or not your are going to live or die. It was just their time to go home. "
No way to save those astronauts. Just like a dragster heading down a track once it goes you are at the mercy of the elements. G_d desides whether or not your are going to live or die. It was just their time to go home. "
BigTexN wrote on Dec 31, 2008 8:52 AM:
" Ummm, yeah boss, we got them rocket boosters put on but we had a whole bunch of these extra bolts left over...should we put'em in the coffee can with the others? "
pprwrtr wrote on Dec 31, 2008 10:41 AM:
" Why is it that everything is covered up from the public until decades later? Then, if we live long enough, we find out the truth! We are told all kind of things when an incident happens. Then, history has to be changed because the truth comes out. If there were that many things wrong, we should have been told and they should have been told that it wasn't safe. NASA's job is to know these things. No wonder the families got a lot of money! Poor management ! Like the 1) financial and 2)government industries! (These two are in bed with each other and we let it go on, pretending we don't know). "
Whiskyecho wrote on Jan 1, 2009 8:12 AM:
" pprwrtr wrote on Dec 31, 2008 10:41 AM:
" Why is it that everything is covered up from the public until decades later?
____________________________________________________________________________________
I disagree with your cover-up theory.
Look at how long it takes for an NTSB investigation to find causes of "common" airplane accidents - a year perhaps, on average ? And they "usually" have everything at hand to make an investigation somewhat easy (easier) - wreckage, voice and data recorders, eye witnesses.
Compare that to what was recovered and available from the columbia and challenger disasters and it's not hard to see why "results" take so long to be determined (and would guess that some of the "results" for these two is pure speculation and consensus).
As tragic as these are, these accidents and the subsequent investigations lend themselves to future safety - in the form of new procedures, checklists, equipment and redesigned hardware. "
" Why is it that everything is covered up from the public until decades later?
____________________________________________________________________________________
I disagree with your cover-up theory.
Look at how long it takes for an NTSB investigation to find causes of "common" airplane accidents - a year perhaps, on average ? And they "usually" have everything at hand to make an investigation somewhat easy (easier) - wreckage, voice and data recorders, eye witnesses.
Compare that to what was recovered and available from the columbia and challenger disasters and it's not hard to see why "results" take so long to be determined (and would guess that some of the "results" for these two is pure speculation and consensus).
As tragic as these are, these accidents and the subsequent investigations lend themselves to future safety - in the form of new procedures, checklists, equipment and redesigned hardware. "
pprwrtr wrote on Jan 1, 2009 8:35 AM:
" Whiskyecho---
You are right. I just got that mixed up with all the scandals of government officials, etc. They should have been exposed years ago when they knew about things going on (such as the past presidents committing adultery, etc., the Kennedys' ties to the Mafia, many people in govt. who are killed and they tell us it was an accident/suicide, etc. I am saturated with govt. lying to us and misrepresenting things and then we find out years or decades later. "
You are right. I just got that mixed up with all the scandals of government officials, etc. They should have been exposed years ago when they knew about things going on (such as the past presidents committing adultery, etc., the Kennedys' ties to the Mafia, many people in govt. who are killed and they tell us it was an accident/suicide, etc. I am saturated with govt. lying to us and misrepresenting things and then we find out years or decades later. "
Whiskyecho wrote on Dec 31, 2008 6:13 AM:
It's hard to imagine what could have been accomplished had all our dollars, over the years, gone into programs like medical research or alternative energy
But what really irritates me is the fact that the crews who perished in both the columbia and the challenger events were "volunteers" - "volunteers", not draftees. The surviving family members received very large insurance pay-offs for their losses. But then, surviving family members sued and received HUGE dollar amounts on top of everything else.
(p.s.: space center houston is a ripoff - I suggest not taking visitors there for a "look-see") "