Parents upset about rezoning options
![]() |
| More than 75 concerned parents gathered inside the Tough Elementary and Intermediate cafeteria Wednesday night to learn about rezoning options the CISD Attendance Boundary Committee created to ease overcrowding at Tough and Deretchin Elementary and Intermediate. |
By Kassia Micek
More than 75 concerned parents gathered inside the Tough Elementary and Intermediate cafeteria Wednesday night to learn about rezoning options the CISD Attendance Boundary Committee created to ease overcrowding at Tough and Deretchin Elementary and Intermediate.
“It doesn’t matter what we tell you … you’ll make the decision that will impact our children,” said Richard Plant, who has a daughter in kindergarten at Tough. “I have very little faith in this process. … This is just lip service.”
He, along with several other parents, received a round of applause after they spoke out against rezoning plans.
“I am very disappointed with this,” said Jose Valades, who has two sons at Tough. “You’ll do whatever you’ll do to benefit you and not to benefit our children.
“I am truly disappointed.”
Rezoning at Tough, which opened in 2002, and Deretchin, which opened in 2005, is needed due to overcrowding at the two schools, district officials said. Both have a capacity of 1,000 students. However, Tough’s 2008-09 enrollment is 1,287, and Deretchin’s is 1,324.
“Through analysis, it was determined there was room at Galatas and Mitchell,” CISD Communications Director Kathy Clark said Thursday. “The biggest growth is at Deretchin and Tough, so we’re making sure if there’s room at Galatas (Elementary) and Mitchell (Intermediate), we’re utilizing that space.”
The CISD Attendance Boundary Committee created 21 scenarios involving Tough, Deretchin, Galatas and Buckalew Elementary. Galatas and Buckalew feed into Mitchell. Eleven scenarios involve Tough and were presented to parents Tuesday.
“There are a lot of combinations there,” CISD Deputy Superintendent Jean Stewart said. “You may be able to think of some scenarios that are better than those.
“We have not made up our mind, but some of the scenarios are more likely to achieve what we ware aiming for.”
The district wants to achieve enrollment of between 1,120 and 1,145 at Tough, enrollment between 1,030 and 1,080 at Deretchin, enrollment between 800 and 850 at Galatas and enrollment between 1,175 and 1,200 at Mitchell, Stewart said. Looking through the different scenarios, Stewart pointed out which scenarios achieved those numbers at the four schools.
Although the committee provided the same scenarios to parents at Tough and Deretchin in separate meetings, the reaction was much different, said Debra Riley, a Deretchin parent who attended all four meetings and has a 50 percent chance of being rezoned.
“We see no light at the end of the tunnel,” she said about overcrowding. “The people at Deretchin have a different attitude. We are desperate to get out of overcrowding.
“We think if there’s a fire, the students can’t get out because they won’t hear the fire alarms.”
The overcrowding is so bad that students start eating lunch at 10:30 a.m. and have recess outside just twice a week because classes have to work in shifts to utilize playground equipment.
At Tough, parents don’t mind students learning in portable buildings.
Valades, who has a 90 percent chance of being rezoned, is worried his children will be at a new school every two years if he is rezoned.
“I don’t think moving is good,” he said about that option.
The district is rezoning schools in three feeder zones and began the process in September by reviewing data and creating rezoning scenarios. Then the CISD Attendance Boundary Committee set up forums to inform parents about the scenarios. Those meetings began in early October and ended Wednesday.
The next step is for the committee to reconvene, review scenarios and parental input, create the proposed rezoning plans and present it to parents before taking it to the CISD school board for final approval Nov. 18
For more information about CISD’s rezoning process, visit administration.conroeisd.net/rezoning.
What’s next
The CISD Attendance Boundary Committee will present proposed Deretchin and Tough zoning plans to parents at the following forums:
• Noon, Nov. 11, Deretchin Elementary and Intermediate, 11000 Merit Oaks Drive in The Woodlands
• 7 p.m., Nov. 11, Deretchin Elementary and Intermediate
• Noon, Nov. 12, Tough Elementary and Intermediate, 11660 Crane Brook in The Woodlands
• 7 p.m., Nov. 12, Tough Elementary and Intermediate
More info
For more information about the Conroe Independent School District’s rezoning process, visit administration.conroeisd.net/rezoning.
Enrollment Numbers
Current attendance
1,324: Deretchin Elementary and Intermediate
1,287: Tough Elementary and Intermediate
1,080: Mitchell Intermediate
548: Galatas Elementary
School capacity
1,000: Deretchin Elementary and Intermediate
1,000: Tough Elementary and Intermediate
1,200: Mitchell Intermediate
850: Galatas Elementary
By the numbers
Enrollment trends
Tough Deretchin
2005 1,096 437
2006 1,124 820
2007 1,229 1,197
2008 1,287 1,324
What’s next
The CISD Attendance Boundary Committee will present proposed zoning plans to parents at the following forums:
• Noon, Monday, Houser Elementary, 27370 Oak Ridge School Road
• 7 p.m., Monday, Houser Elementary
• Noon, Tuesday, Ford Elementary, 25460 Richard Road in Spring
• 7 p.m., Tuesday, Broadway Elementary, 2855 Spring Trails Bend in Spring
• Noon, Nov. 3, Armstrong Elementary, 110 Gladstell St.
• 7 p.m., Nov. 3, Travis Intermediate, 1100 N.Tompson
• Noon, Nov. 4, Runyan Elementary, 1101 Foster Drive
• 7 p.m., Nov. 4, Houston Elementary, 1000 N Thompson St.
• Noon, Nov. 6, Giesinger Elementary, 2323 White Oak Blvd.
• 7 p.m., Nov. 6, Cryar Elementary, 2375 Montgomery Park Blvd.
Submit a Comment
|
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
Not yet a registered member?
Click here to become one. Comments to stories and articles on the Web site are not edited or pre-approved before appearing online. Readers posting comments are solely responsible for those comments. Comments must be germane to the story to which they apply. Online comments that are libelous, profane or personally attack another site participant can be reported as abuse using the link provided on each comment. Comments reported as abusive will be reviewed and may be removed from view, as will off-topic comments. BE CIVIL. Individuals continually posting abusive comments to the site may have their registrations revoked. |
Reader Comments
montgomerygal wrote on Oct 24, 2008 11:52 AM:
Five 0h wrote on Oct 24, 2008 2:21 PM:
ICanSpellRhino wrote on Oct 24, 2008 2:42 PM:
WoodlandsMom wrote on Oct 24, 2008 3:16 PM:
The rest of The Woodlands needs to wake up to the school overcrowding crisis that is going on Sterling Ridge and Indian Springs. Right now, parents at other Woodlands elementaries figure their school population is stable, so why should they worry about OUR problem? Well, soon "our" problem is going to be YOUR problem. No matter what CISD and The Woodlands officials say, there is not enough space in our schools to match the number of homes being built over the next few years. This current round of rezoning may be enough to temporarily delay the meltdown, but only for a few years. As of this move, Galatas will be full. There's no room anywhere else to put the hundreds of children who will come from the hundreds of homes, apartments and townhomes still being built. The math does not add up.
Once our schools are over capacity and all the other Woodlands elementaries are full, in 2-3 years maximum, (except for Ride, where room is being reserved for Jacob's Reserve) then more rezoning will have to take place and it will involve moving everyone in all Woodlands K-4 schools, plus adding portables to all of them. It's the only way unless CISD faces the fact that they should have built a school in Indian Springs and does just that. We keep being told there is no land, but there is.....The Woodlands Corp. just wants to use it for more shopping centers and banks instead of schools. We're paying for a half billion dollar plus bond and The Woodlands didn't even get ONE of the seven schools to be built, despite the fact that we have some of the most overcrowded elementaries. CISD's own projections show no relief until well after 2016!
So unless you want your child attending a school well away from where you live, and probably going to class in portables for a couple of years of K-4, you should pay heed to what we in Sterling Ridge and Indian Springs are going through, because it will affect YOUR future. And once it happens, it's going to last a long time. CISD will not admit that The Woodlands is still booming in some areas and a school should have been built two years ago. The Woodlands Corp. will not stop allowing residential development, despite the fact that there is no school space for the children who will reside in those homes. They approved a 310 unit apartment complex just across from Deretchin even though the school was at capacity. Even after it was at capacity, they allowed townhomes to begin being built. It's all about the money, with no regard for education or even common sense.
In the upcoming board election, vote for a candidate who recognizes that The Woodlands needs another elementary school so that we can ALL avoid a disaster in the near future. "
Boadicea wrote on Oct 24, 2008 4:59 PM:
tired of rino's like sadler wrote on Oct 24, 2008 5:06 PM:
Out of touch??????? You do not even know what RINO means . . . how shallow and out of touch you are! As far as me being out of touch my CISD property taxes continue to keep me in touch and broke! ICanSpellRhino is obviously a CISD employee that has sipped the Kool Aid! "
tired of rino's like sadler wrote on Oct 24, 2008 5:12 PM:
Also, why why why should all citizens have to pay for education. If a parent brings them into the world shouldn' t they be responsible to pay for their education vs. their neighbor?
Just a thought but isn't public education a form of socialism. "
drivermom wrote on Oct 24, 2008 6:28 PM:
I went to Conroe High School and I lived in the Woodlands area at the time. We did not have ANY schools in this area. We had to get on a bus at the crack of dawn and go into town which was over 10 miles away. We took I-45 into town. We went down 1488 to pick up others and then went into town and picked up kids there as well. Many times there were not enough seats and someone had to stand. Oh, and we all rode the same bus from K thru 12. Our parents did not raise cain like you are. We were going to school to get an education, and that was the bottom line.
I have read your comments here on other issues and you are of the opinion that you are better than everyone else, simply because you live in the Woodlands. Guess what you are not!
If you think that your children are being crammed into a class room - I suggest that you either enroll them in private school such as John Cooper or The Woodlands Christian Accademy or home school the darlings! "
drivermom wrote on Oct 24, 2008 8:01 PM:
WoodlandsMom wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:13 PM:
I'm tired of hearing, "Back in my day," and "I was rezoned X number of times." Just because things were one way in the past doesn't mean people should put up with it forever if a BETTER way is available. In fact, part of what you say makes my point. CISD waits until a crisis is on their hands and then they REACT. Instead, how about some foresight and a little proactive planning so we can avoid a crisis now and then? What a novel concept!
I was only addressing the situation my school is involved in. I am aware others rezoning issues are being decided by CISD, but it's all I can do to keep up with THIS one. The elementaries involved are Deretchin, Tough, Galatas and possibly Buckalew. Mitchell Intermediate is affected by how many 5-6 graders are moved out of Tough. So in our situation, as many as 5 schools may be involved. Between Deretchin and Tough, we have 2600-ish students spread over a large geographic area. I can only address the situation involving them, not the students in Conroe or Oak Ridge.
The gist of my message is that being told that the population will "eventually" being to decline, when it will take more than 10 years for us to fall to anywhere approaching our maximum capacity at the two largest elementary/flex schools in The Woodlands, is cold comfort. Our two schools will soon cause a third (Galatas) to increase to its capacity. After that, the inevitable increases in population coming in just a few years, will cause the other Woodlands elementaries to be caught up in a ripple effect. Every one of them will likely be seriously overcrowded for years, just because no one will admit there was poor planning regarding the size/location/number of elementary schools in The Woodlands.
In case you have forgotten, people in The Woodlands will also pay for the new bond. Schools should be built wherever they are needed in CISD. Conroe, Oak Ridge, wherever. And one of those "wherevers" is Indian Springs in The Woodlands. This is not about me not wanting my child rezoned. I'd be happy to move to Tough. Being rezoned really will not hurt my family. My concern is the bigger picture. If we can spend $38 million on a stadium, surely we can afford to build a school when it's desperately needed.
Long story short, The Woodlands Development Corp. has never met a plan to build houses that it didn't love.....Even when there is absolutely no place for miles around to educate those children because all the schools are overflowing.
Believe me, we've asked CISD to consider revamping attendance zones in a more meaningful manner (one that will last more than two years and be more than a Bandaid) but they will not consider it. We've asked why students from outside The Woodlands are being bused into The Woodlands while children who are residents of The Woodlands have to attend overcrowded schools. We ask ourselves, "If Deretchin and Tough are at about 1300, with a capacity of 1000 and Deretchin can easily expect 200-400 in the next few years, (no matter what The Woodlands Development Corp. says) why aren't we being allowed to use all the available space in other Woodlands schools to alleviate that overcrowding? Why are they busing in students when we are in dire need of those classrooms? If they're going to bus them, bus them someplace that has space, not someplace that is terribly overcrowded. If we're going to rezone, at least let us have access to Woodlands classrooms." That's not greedy....It just makes sense. It makes sense to stop busing kids in from miles away when kids nearby need that space, and the bused kids could just as easily be bused to another school that is just as close to their homes as the one they're already attending.
We hear, "That's where we've always bused them." We say, "That was fine when schools had extra room, but they don't anymore. The situation has changed and not for the better. Now it's time to look at what makes sense TODAY with fresh eyes, considering all the variables." That is what is NOT being done. We want long range planning, not a 2 year Bandaid. I think that's reasonable, whether you live in The Woodlands, Conroe or Oak Ridge. "
mdonn76405 wrote on Oct 24, 2008 9:34 PM:
proud mom wrote on Oct 24, 2008 10:52 PM:
WoodlandsMom wrote on Oct 24, 2008 10:59 PM:
The article was a bit off the mark about some of the comments made, but it did convey many of the concerns of the parents. Last year at Deretchin, the students in portables could not hear the fire alarms and tornado alarms. Unless they had prior notice of a drill, they missed the drill until someone let them know what was going on. If the fire or tornado had been real, we could have had a tragedy on our hands. Three grades in portables (21 classes or so) is excessive. That is approaching half the school. Another fear was that if we ever did have a real tornado, there would simply not be sufficient room for all the children to take cover. There is only so much "interior" room in any building, and when a 1000 student building has to protect 1325 students, using only its interior rooms, reality tells us someone will likely be left out. Children deserve better.
It sickens me that some seem to get some sort of perverse pleasure that these children are being placed in potentially dangerous situations, simply because they are "Woodlands kids." That says much more about the person holding that opinion than it does about anyone living in The Woodlands. "
WoodlandsMom wrote on Oct 24, 2008 11:24 PM:
In our case, Tough was supposed to be the LAST elementary school in The Woodlands because they projected (gotta love it!) that it would hold all the students that would live in the rest of the homes to be built in The Woodlands. Within two years, it had reached capacity and by the third year, they needed portables. So it was obsolete in just two years. CISD scrambled and built Deretchin, promising that it would really, really be the only other elementary we'd ever need. By the end of its second year, every room was full. By the beginning of the third year, just like Tough, Deretchin was using portables. Again, obsolete after just two years. The school that was meant to fix everything....
Anytime you build "the last school needed" and it's overflowing within two years, you have messed up. When you go ahead and build a SECOND "last school needed" only a few years later and THAT school is overflowing after just two years with more kids coming in every day, you have seriously messed up. Now we're told that even though over 250 more homes and 310 apartments are going up, we'll get just 148 children from them. No one believes that. Amazingly, we truly need "another last school" because someone just can't seem to count.
Yes, we can rezone ONE MORE TIME, but this is it. After this, we have no more empty rooms to fill. And even after rezoning, Tough and Deretchin will certainly be at 1100-1200. So like you, I wonder why CISD is building schools when and where they are building them. In your case, it seems you think they should wait, fill up available classrooms first and then build if needed after those options are taken.....especially in light of today's economic situation. And that makes sense. In our case, Deretchin parents had to plead to be rezoned to fill the empty classrooms at the one school with room. Our overcrowding made us willing to rezone. But we know this rezoning will not fix the problem for long and after this we have no more empty rooms. We wonder why CISD is intent on building schools that are destined to stay half-empty for years while we are sitting here in overcrowded conditions and need a school NOW. It would be full for a minimum of 10 years, based on CISD's numbers....And their numbers are always too low.
So they build where it ISN'T needed and won't build where it IS needed. It makes no sense. Children are the last ones being considered. "
drivermom wrote on Oct 25, 2008 7:51 AM:
Overcrowding has always been an issues and I don't give a hoot what the fine folks of the Woodlands think anymore than I can fly!
Get over it move on. All the complaining is not going to resolve any issues. Take it to the board and DO NOT set up any special little Woodlands only residents. There is a forum for this issue and it needs to be addressed properly and through the proper channels. "
tired of rinos like sadler wrote on Oct 25, 2008 11:44 AM:
Also, why why why should all citizens have to pay for education. If a parent brings them into the world shouldn' t they be responsible to pay for their education vs. their neighbor?
Just a thought but isn't public education a form of socialism. "
CherokeeToo wrote on Oct 25, 2008 5:31 PM:



tired of rino's like sadler wrote on Oct 24, 2008 8:38 AM:
VOTE ALL INCUMBENTS OUT OF OFFICE. "