Print
E-mail
Comment
Texas ranks 2nd in the nation in jobs lost to unfair trade
WASHINGTON – Texas lost 405,300 jobs in 2007 to rank second in the nation in the total number of jobs lost, according to a new report by the Economic Policy Institute.
Even without considering the glut of foreign oil imports, the United States’ massive trade deficit with all of its trading partners resulted in the loss or displacement of 5.6 million jobs in 2007. The net job loss due to the U.S. non-oil trade deficit has been felt nationwide, displacing workers and weakening job growth in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
“The turmoil on Wall Street can only compound the problems of an already weakening job market,” said Robert E. Scott, EPI’s director of international programs and the author of the report. “Our research shows no state or sector is exempt from the impact of non-oil U.S. trade deficits.”
While several factors contribute to the nation’s trade deficit, the most important causes “are the unfair trade practices of many U.S. trading partners, especially the distortion of exchange rates through the currency intervention policies of China and other Asian governments,” the report states. Ending currency manipulation by the Chinese government is essential in order to persuade Japan and other currency manipulators to end these practices as well, it concluded.
“The overall U.S. trade deficit has grown steadily for almost two decades, mainly draining jobs in the manufacturing sectors,” Scott said. “Ending unfair trade practices can significantly improve the fundamentals of the domestic economy and help restore sustainable, broadly shared growth of jobs and income.”
In addition to the loss of jobs, “competition with artificially cheap imports has also put downward pressure on the wages of all U.S. workers,” the report concludes. Between 2000 and 2007, workers displaced from manufacturing — the sector hardest hit by U.S. non-oil trade deficits — are often forced to take jobs in sectors such as in home health care, accommodation and food service industries, where wages are typically much lower than in manufacturing. The average wages of those who secured re-employment were 11 percent to 13 percent lower than in their previous jobs.
The report notes that the dollar has lost substantial value, facilitating U.S. exports, but imports have skyrocketed because of unfair trade policies by other countries. The elimination of the U.S. non-oil trade deficit could support millions of new jobs in export industries, and contribute to the revitalization of U.S. manufacturing, it said.
More than 4 million (70 percent) of the jobs displaced in 2007 were in the manufacturing sector. The automobile industry in Michigan was hit hard, along with computer and electronic components in such states as California, Texas, Oregon and Minnesota. Another hard-hit major industrial sector is textile, clothing and accessories, with job loss especially affecting the Carolinas, Tennessee, Kentucky and other southern states.
Tables showing the state-by-state job loss totals, and as a share of total employment, due to the U.S. trade deficit, can be viewed online at www.epi.org/content.cfm/bp222.
Even without considering the glut of foreign oil imports, the United States’ massive trade deficit with all of its trading partners resulted in the loss or displacement of 5.6 million jobs in 2007. The net job loss due to the U.S. non-oil trade deficit has been felt nationwide, displacing workers and weakening job growth in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
“The turmoil on Wall Street can only compound the problems of an already weakening job market,” said Robert E. Scott, EPI’s director of international programs and the author of the report. “Our research shows no state or sector is exempt from the impact of non-oil U.S. trade deficits.”
While several factors contribute to the nation’s trade deficit, the most important causes “are the unfair trade practices of many U.S. trading partners, especially the distortion of exchange rates through the currency intervention policies of China and other Asian governments,” the report states. Ending currency manipulation by the Chinese government is essential in order to persuade Japan and other currency manipulators to end these practices as well, it concluded.
“The overall U.S. trade deficit has grown steadily for almost two decades, mainly draining jobs in the manufacturing sectors,” Scott said. “Ending unfair trade practices can significantly improve the fundamentals of the domestic economy and help restore sustainable, broadly shared growth of jobs and income.”
In addition to the loss of jobs, “competition with artificially cheap imports has also put downward pressure on the wages of all U.S. workers,” the report concludes. Between 2000 and 2007, workers displaced from manufacturing — the sector hardest hit by U.S. non-oil trade deficits — are often forced to take jobs in sectors such as in home health care, accommodation and food service industries, where wages are typically much lower than in manufacturing. The average wages of those who secured re-employment were 11 percent to 13 percent lower than in their previous jobs.
The report notes that the dollar has lost substantial value, facilitating U.S. exports, but imports have skyrocketed because of unfair trade policies by other countries. The elimination of the U.S. non-oil trade deficit could support millions of new jobs in export industries, and contribute to the revitalization of U.S. manufacturing, it said.
More than 4 million (70 percent) of the jobs displaced in 2007 were in the manufacturing sector. The automobile industry in Michigan was hit hard, along with computer and electronic components in such states as California, Texas, Oregon and Minnesota. Another hard-hit major industrial sector is textile, clothing and accessories, with job loss especially affecting the Carolinas, Tennessee, Kentucky and other southern states.
Tables showing the state-by-state job loss totals, and as a share of total employment, due to the U.S. trade deficit, can be viewed online at www.epi.org/content.cfm/bp222.
Submit a Comment
|
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
Not yet a registered member?
Click here to become one. Comments to stories and articles on the Web site are not edited or pre-approved before appearing online. Readers posting comments are solely responsible for those comments. Comments must be germane to the story to which they apply. Online comments that are libelous, profane or personally attack another site participant can be reported as abuse using the link provided on each comment. Comments reported as abusive will be reviewed and may be removed from view, as will off-topic comments. BE CIVIL. Individuals continually posting abusive comments to the site may have their registrations revoked. |
pasadenaof1956 wrote on Oct 8, 2008 10:39 AM: